Babel (2006)
At first I thought this movie was going to really blow me away. The style and direction is so great. The scenery and cinematography is just great.
But the story seems to be about people screwing up and either hurting themselves or others. I'm not sure if I missed the point or if it was so obvious that I was just like "Sure, we all know that - our actions can hurt other people." Not sure???
SPOILERS
I felt bad for the kids b/c the nanny did so many wrong things. Her punishment was not only appropriate, but her own fault willingly. There was no sympathy there except that the kids won't see someone they love... or maybe they will. She was in the U.S. for 16 years illegally - she cd just do it again??? Sorry, tangent.
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Monday, September 03, 2007
Superbad (2007) - 2/5
Superbad (2007)
Several funny parts, but the F-word is dropped 186 times (found that online) which is a TON. It's so distracting - you can barely even follow what they're saying b/c it's every other word. I think it hurts the comedy and lowers the characters.
Michael Cera is great, but I see him as such an innocent guy that some of the topics in the movie stood out as awkward for him IMO.
Several funny parts, but the F-word is dropped 186 times (found that online) which is a TON. It's so distracting - you can barely even follow what they're saying b/c it's every other word. I think it hurts the comedy and lowers the characters.
Michael Cera is great, but I see him as such an innocent guy that some of the topics in the movie stood out as awkward for him IMO.
Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny (2006) - 2/5
Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny (2006)
Not Jack Black's best. He's funny, but the premise and such just aren't enough.
It's pretty thin all around. Tim Robbin's has a small role which is pretty random.
Not Jack Black's best. He's funny, but the premise and such just aren't enough.
It's pretty thin all around. Tim Robbin's has a small role which is pretty random.
Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan (2006) - 3/5
Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan (2006)
Pretty funny, but cd be quite offensive or at least very uncomfortable to some.
It's something like one long Jackass skit: pranks, jokes, potty humor, etc.
Be warned, there's quite a bit of male nudity.
Pretty funny, but cd be quite offensive or at least very uncomfortable to some.
It's something like one long Jackass skit: pranks, jokes, potty humor, etc.
Be warned, there's quite a bit of male nudity.
Monday, August 27, 2007
Block Party (2005) - 2/5
Block Party (2005)
I had high hopes for this movie w/ Dave making some good observations and being open minded and showing others doing the same.
The 'Broken Angel' couple is probably the highlight of the movie but it has little to do w/ anything else Dave did or intended.
The concert brought everything back down to a disappointing level.
I had high hopes for this movie w/ Dave making some good observations and being open minded and showing others doing the same.
The 'Broken Angel' couple is probably the highlight of the movie but it has little to do w/ anything else Dave did or intended.
The concert brought everything back down to a disappointing level.
The Thin Red Line (1998) - 3.5/5
The Thin Red Line (1998)
I actually watched this a while back and just realized I hadn't blogged about it. It's not too fresh in my mind now though.
It's a very powerful movie: strong images and characters.
I actually watched this a while back and just realized I hadn't blogged about it. It's not too fresh in my mind now though.
It's a very powerful movie: strong images and characters.
Letters from Iwo Jima (2006) - 3/5
Letters from Iwo Jima (2006)
The companion movie to "Flags of Our Fathers" - very similar in some ways and, of course, very different. Again, great film processing.
I didn't feel the connection too strongly. Saigo was a great character though.
I think this is probably a better film than I'm thinking - I think I'm just a bit burned out on the war/battle movies at the moment.
The companion movie to "Flags of Our Fathers" - very similar in some ways and, of course, very different. Again, great film processing.
I didn't feel the connection too strongly. Saigo was a great character though.
I think this is probably a better film than I'm thinking - I think I'm just a bit burned out on the war/battle movies at the moment.
Muppets from Space (1999) - 1.5/5
Muppets from Space (1999)
Maybe my standards for these movies are too high... though the first one was really good.
Thin in most respects.
Maybe my standards for these movies are too high... though the first one was really good.
Thin in most respects.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Kingdom of Heaven (2005) - 3/5
Kingdom of Heaven (2005)
The action was pretty good and the battles wd have been incredible if I cd have prevented myself from comparing them to LOTR.
The story was good, but I didn't buy into it all 100% as far as a love story or his commitment to his family, people, religion, etc.
Mostly I think Orlando Bloom just cdn't pull it off IMO.
The action was pretty good and the battles wd have been incredible if I cd have prevented myself from comparing them to LOTR.
The story was good, but I didn't buy into it all 100% as far as a love story or his commitment to his family, people, religion, etc.
Mostly I think Orlando Bloom just cdn't pull it off IMO.
Rush Hour 3 (2007) - 1.5/5
Rush Hour 3 (2007)
Same jokes as the last two and probably worse action/fights. It felt formulaic and forced and the action felt a lot like Hong Kong action.
Same jokes as the last two and probably worse action/fights. It felt formulaic and forced and the action felt a lot like Hong Kong action.
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Flags of Our Fathers (2006) - 3.5/5
Flags of Our Fathers (2006)
Good story and action. The film processing they used was great as it gave the color tone a great feel for the battle scenes.
It's tough not to compare this movie to others and in some ways it falls a bit short.
Ultimately, this movie had a hard battle to win me over b/c I read the book which was great and the movie can hardly compare.
Good story and action. The film processing they used was great as it gave the color tone a great feel for the battle scenes.
It's tough not to compare this movie to others and in some ways it falls a bit short.
Ultimately, this movie had a hard battle to win me over b/c I read the book which was great and the movie can hardly compare.
Monday, August 20, 2007
The Butterfly Effect (2004) - 2.5/5
The Butterfly Effect (2004)
This movie is tough to get a handle on. I watched the director's cut which was recommended to me.
I really liked the idea and story, but it wasn't put together very well. A lot of the directing and writing seemed to come from the mind of a junior high student: pretty cliche, unbelievable and unjustifiable.
SPOILERS
Anything w/ a "time travel" type idea is cool to me so that helps, but that's about all this had: change something in the past and everything changes. Like "Sliding Doors" and other movies that show different possible timelines.
I usually rather a movie not explain the technical stuff b/c that just gives you a chance to disagree. However, in this case: how did reliving thoughts allow him to time travel?
There were so many shots that were just cliche like walking thru the halls of the institution w/ "crazy people" walking around and the different punk/goth students and frat boys, etc. It was just distracting.
This movie is tough to get a handle on. I watched the director's cut which was recommended to me.
I really liked the idea and story, but it wasn't put together very well. A lot of the directing and writing seemed to come from the mind of a junior high student: pretty cliche, unbelievable and unjustifiable.
SPOILERS
Anything w/ a "time travel" type idea is cool to me so that helps, but that's about all this had: change something in the past and everything changes. Like "Sliding Doors" and other movies that show different possible timelines.
I usually rather a movie not explain the technical stuff b/c that just gives you a chance to disagree. However, in this case: how did reliving thoughts allow him to time travel?
There were so many shots that were just cliche like walking thru the halls of the institution w/ "crazy people" walking around and the different punk/goth students and frat boys, etc. It was just distracting.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price (2005) (V) - 3.5/5
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price (2005) (V)
I thought this was a well-done version of a biased documentary. They presented the arguments and didn't really seem to hide their stance (Heck, even the title implies they have something negative towards WalMart).
However, the did it in a classy way so that you want to try to see their side and give their arguments some credit.
I was afraid this movie was going to focus too much on low wages and poor benefits which is hard to blame on WalMart. They're just giving us what we want: low prices at the cost of our economical future and local jobs, etc.
They wd pay a higher wage if fewer people were willing to work there. They wdn't run local businesses out if local residences didn't shop there, etc.
I'm not fan of WalMart and I don't shop there. I don't think their policies (from what I understand) are generally illegal (though they have lost more than their share of law suits on not paying employees for overtime, EPA violations, etc.), but I'd have to say they are somewhat immoral.
The several former WalMart managers they have in the movie describe the practices and many are clearly wrong and illegal. Who's to say they are accurately telling the truth, but if they are...
The biggest thing about this to me is that people shop there thinking they're getting a good deal when really the cost is just coming from somewhere else: higher taxes to pay for subsidies paid to WalMart, lost jobs to overseas factories, lower quality products, larger drain on social programs, etc.
I thought this was a well-done version of a biased documentary. They presented the arguments and didn't really seem to hide their stance (Heck, even the title implies they have something negative towards WalMart).
However, the did it in a classy way so that you want to try to see their side and give their arguments some credit.
I was afraid this movie was going to focus too much on low wages and poor benefits which is hard to blame on WalMart. They're just giving us what we want: low prices at the cost of our economical future and local jobs, etc.
They wd pay a higher wage if fewer people were willing to work there. They wdn't run local businesses out if local residences didn't shop there, etc.
I'm not fan of WalMart and I don't shop there. I don't think their policies (from what I understand) are generally illegal (though they have lost more than their share of law suits on not paying employees for overtime, EPA violations, etc.), but I'd have to say they are somewhat immoral.
The several former WalMart managers they have in the movie describe the practices and many are clearly wrong and illegal. Who's to say they are accurately telling the truth, but if they are...
The biggest thing about this to me is that people shop there thinking they're getting a good deal when really the cost is just coming from somewhere else: higher taxes to pay for subsidies paid to WalMart, lost jobs to overseas factories, lower quality products, larger drain on social programs, etc.
Mystic River (2003) - 3.5/5
Mystic River (2003)
This movie had a lot going for it and it went pretty well for the most part.
If kinda felt like a good attempt to copy a Scorsese movie... almost there, but never got 'big' enough.
The premise was good and the acting was very good. A well made movie that kinda got a little loose at times.
SPOILERS
The twist was cool, but I expected it too much. Laura Linney's speech about "you cd rule this town" - a lot of people seem disappointed w/ this, but I thought it was good.
The shunning of Celeste at the end was out of place to me.
Sean's reconciliation w/ his wife felt a bit forced and fast. I did like, however, the mirrored aspects of his wife's silence and Brendan's brother's silence. Kinda like each of their counterparts had to figure something out to get them to communicate... or something. Not sure it worked, but...???
This movie had a lot going for it and it went pretty well for the most part.
If kinda felt like a good attempt to copy a Scorsese movie... almost there, but never got 'big' enough.
The premise was good and the acting was very good. A well made movie that kinda got a little loose at times.
SPOILERS
The twist was cool, but I expected it too much. Laura Linney's speech about "you cd rule this town" - a lot of people seem disappointed w/ this, but I thought it was good.
The shunning of Celeste at the end was out of place to me.
Sean's reconciliation w/ his wife felt a bit forced and fast. I did like, however, the mirrored aspects of his wife's silence and Brendan's brother's silence. Kinda like each of their counterparts had to figure something out to get them to communicate... or something. Not sure it worked, but...???
Monday, August 13, 2007
Gosford Park (2001) - 2.5/5
Gosford Park (2001)
Like "Gangs of New York" - good acting, characters and setting, but nothing I really wound up caring about. They did a good job of really building up the reality of the house/people/servants/etc. That was great, but then they didn't do a ton w/ it.
SPOILERS
The murder just didn't really matter to me. The idea of the "who dunnit" in this setting is clever and original, but maybe not a great result.
The scene w/ the 2 sisters near the end was the best part of the movie, IMO.
Like "Gangs of New York" - good acting, characters and setting, but nothing I really wound up caring about. They did a good job of really building up the reality of the house/people/servants/etc. That was great, but then they didn't do a ton w/ it.
SPOILERS
The murder just didn't really matter to me. The idea of the "who dunnit" in this setting is clever and original, but maybe not a great result.
The scene w/ the 2 sisters near the end was the best part of the movie, IMO.
The Simpsons Movie (2007) - 2.5/5
The Simpsons Movie (2007)
I was pretty disappointed. The first few mins were great (the "Itchy and Scratchy" cartoon), but there wasn't too much after that for me.
There were funny parts, but like w/ many TV-to-movie cases, it seemed like a drawn out episode w/o proportionally enough gags/jokes/etc.
The animation was technically better than the episodes (though I haven't watch the show in a while) which was fun to see.
I was pretty disappointed. The first few mins were great (the "Itchy and Scratchy" cartoon), but there wasn't too much after that for me.
There were funny parts, but like w/ many TV-to-movie cases, it seemed like a drawn out episode w/o proportionally enough gags/jokes/etc.
The animation was technically better than the episodes (though I haven't watch the show in a while) which was fun to see.
Wednesday, August 08, 2007
Gangs of New York (2002) - 3.5/5
Gangs of New York (2002)
Great acting, characters and setting, but ultimately I didn't really buy into the story from Vallon/Amsterdam's point of view.
It was interesting to see it all w/in the backdrop of the changing America.
SPOILERS
I guess b/c he got so close w/ Bill that I didn't feel the revenge strong enough to really want him to kill him.
Great acting, characters and setting, but ultimately I didn't really buy into the story from Vallon/Amsterdam's point of view.
It was interesting to see it all w/in the backdrop of the changing America.
SPOILERS
I guess b/c he got so close w/ Bill that I didn't feel the revenge strong enough to really want him to kill him.
Sunday, August 05, 2007
The Bourne Ultimatum (2007) - 4.5/5
The Bourne Ultimatum (2007)
I might go back and give this a 5/5??? It's hard to say if it was better than the first b/c not only was "The Bourne Identity" great, but also it was new, fresh and original. This being a sequel kinda discounts some of that.
The story was good, but not as good as the first one to me. However, the action was probably better and I'd say in some cases the best. I feel confident in saying that this movie contains the best fight scene... ever.
Some great car chases too.
Very fun. Very cool. Just a great, great spy/action movie.
SPOILERS
The fight scene I'm talking about is the one in Tangier. I love the dimensions of it that it builds from the bombing to the chases to the fight. It really makes it long w/o drawing it out or getting old - just building in intensity.
Another thing that was pretty cool was that the majority of this movie's story takes place btwn the last two scenes of the previous movie.
This movie starts when Bourne leaves the Russian girls apartment. Then you have most of the movie. Then Bourne calls Landy in this movie near the end which is the last scene of the "Supremacy."
Nothing too big, but kinda cool.
I might go back and give this a 5/5??? It's hard to say if it was better than the first b/c not only was "The Bourne Identity" great, but also it was new, fresh and original. This being a sequel kinda discounts some of that.
The story was good, but not as good as the first one to me. However, the action was probably better and I'd say in some cases the best. I feel confident in saying that this movie contains the best fight scene... ever.
Some great car chases too.
Very fun. Very cool. Just a great, great spy/action movie.
SPOILERS
The fight scene I'm talking about is the one in Tangier. I love the dimensions of it that it builds from the bombing to the chases to the fight. It really makes it long w/o drawing it out or getting old - just building in intensity.
Another thing that was pretty cool was that the majority of this movie's story takes place btwn the last two scenes of the previous movie.
This movie starts when Bourne leaves the Russian girls apartment. Then you have most of the movie. Then Bourne calls Landy in this movie near the end which is the last scene of the "Supremacy."
Nothing too big, but kinda cool.
Wednesday, August 01, 2007
Rescue from Gilligan's Island (1978) (TV) - 1/5
Rescue from Gilligan's Island (1978) (TV)
I thought it wd be funny to watch this after all these years... not so much.
I didn't realize this, but this TV movie was made 11 years after the show went off the air. Also, supposedly it was made as a pilot to another series. Bad idea.
Anyway, it was pretty bad.
I thought it wd be funny to watch this after all these years... not so much.
I didn't realize this, but this TV movie was made 11 years after the show went off the air. Also, supposedly it was made as a pilot to another series. Bad idea.
Anyway, it was pretty bad.
I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry (2007) - 1/5
I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry (2007)
The first 2/3rds was pretty funny and not really offensive. Then it became the opposite: blatant, not funny and offensive.
The first 2/3rds was pretty funny and not really offensive. Then it became the opposite: blatant, not funny and offensive.
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
The Cider House Rules (1999) - 3/5
The Cider House Rules (1999)
Well done and original, but a big heavy handed (not as bad as "Million Dollar Baby" though) about abortion at times.
There's a good story and acting and powerful subjects in here, but it's easy to see what side "they" are on.
SPOILERS
Mr. Rose's speech about the "rules" pretty much gives it all away.
Then he has Homer burn the rules... just like the aborted babies including Mr. Rose's baby from his own daughter. Does burning something make it really "go away"?
Consider the possibility that someone who maybe knows more than you wrote those rules.
Well done and original, but a big heavy handed (not as bad as "Million Dollar Baby" though) about abortion at times.
There's a good story and acting and powerful subjects in here, but it's easy to see what side "they" are on.
SPOILERS
Mr. Rose's speech about the "rules" pretty much gives it all away.
They outrageous, them rules. Who live in this cider house? Who grindin' up those apples, pressin' that cider, cleanin' up all this mess? Who just plain live here, just breathin' in that vinegar? Well, someone who don't live here made those rules. Those rules ain't for us. We are supposed to make our own rules. And we do. Every single day.
Then he has Homer burn the rules... just like the aborted babies including Mr. Rose's baby from his own daughter. Does burning something make it really "go away"?
Consider the possibility that someone who maybe knows more than you wrote those rules.
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Ratatouille (2007) - 3.5/5
Ratatouille (2007)
Another great movie all around for what it is: clever, cute, well done and respectable in content and form.
The story doesn't rely on cheap humor or pop-culture so it sd stand up to time. The animation is great, but more importantly the story and characters are strong.
Also, it's clean and non-offensive - that's not a given these days for a "kids movie."
It was a breath or fresh air in a genre that's risking becoming somewhat stale at times.
Another great movie all around for what it is: clever, cute, well done and respectable in content and form.
The story doesn't rely on cheap humor or pop-culture so it sd stand up to time. The animation is great, but more importantly the story and characters are strong.
Also, it's clean and non-offensive - that's not a given these days for a "kids movie."
It was a breath or fresh air in a genre that's risking becoming somewhat stale at times.
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Out of Africa (1985) - 4/5
Out of Africa (1985)
This is just a good movie. The story is strong, the acting is good (Streep is dead on) and all the extras and minor characters are completely convincing.
Also, it's rather epic: it's a long story that isn't rushed.
I wdn't say it's the most "entertaining" movie, but it's a good story told well.
This is just a good movie. The story is strong, the acting is good (Streep is dead on) and all the extras and minor characters are completely convincing.
Also, it's rather epic: it's a long story that isn't rushed.
I wdn't say it's the most "entertaining" movie, but it's a good story told well.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) - 3.5/5
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)
I'm not the biggest fan of the previous Potter movies, so saying this is my favorite isn't saying too much. But I did really like this one. It is a good story, not too complex and complicated by tangent storylines and characters.
Also, it didn't fall in to the same things that bothered me about the previous movies. The two main ones being: introducing major ideas as commonplace that weren't introduced in previous movies but sd have been if they are commonplace and, the main one, the seemingly bad guy is really a good guy. They just did that too much.
Anyway, this one was complicated enough to enjoy, but not overboard and did pretty much everything else well too.
I'm not the biggest fan of the previous Potter movies, so saying this is my favorite isn't saying too much. But I did really like this one. It is a good story, not too complex and complicated by tangent storylines and characters.
Also, it didn't fall in to the same things that bothered me about the previous movies. The two main ones being: introducing major ideas as commonplace that weren't introduced in previous movies but sd have been if they are commonplace and, the main one, the seemingly bad guy is really a good guy. They just did that too much.
Anyway, this one was complicated enough to enjoy, but not overboard and did pretty much everything else well too.
The Great Muppet Caper (1981) - 2/5
The Great Muppet Caper (1981)
An unfortunate disappointment. I guess they only had the one good movie in them. There was a few decent things about this movie, but overall, it's pretty weak.
Charles Grodin is probably the high-light if there is one. His commitment to his part is great. Like Liza Minnelli in "Arrested Development" (she also was in "The Muppets Take Manhattan").
An unfortunate disappointment. I guess they only had the one good movie in them. There was a few decent things about this movie, but overall, it's pretty weak.
Charles Grodin is probably the high-light if there is one. His commitment to his part is great. Like Liza Minnelli in "Arrested Development" (she also was in "The Muppets Take Manhattan").
Postino, Il (1994) - 4/5
Postino, Il (1994)
Great characters and beautiful lives. I want to move to the location of this movie.
Who could watch this and not fall in love w/ Mario?
Great characters and beautiful lives. I want to move to the location of this movie.
Who could watch this and not fall in love w/ Mario?
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
The Verdict (1982) - 3.5/5
The Verdict (1982)
This was a good movie, but just short of great. The story was good, the acting was good and the twists and "revealings" were good. But just not great.
It might have been great in '82, but since then, it's been done too many times in too many ways.
The pace is really good too. It doesn't wear you out, but takes you to the edge and you feel what Frank is going thru.
This was a good movie, but just short of great. The story was good, the acting was good and the twists and "revealings" were good. But just not great.
It might have been great in '82, but since then, it's been done too many times in too many ways.
The pace is really good too. It doesn't wear you out, but takes you to the edge and you feel what Frank is going thru.
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Fay Grim (2006) - 3.5/5
Fay Grim (2006)
When I started watching this, I wasn't impressed and almost decided not to finish the movie. I'm glad I did. A certain bad actor had a smaller role the rest of the movie and Parker's style no longer suffered from it. Also, as her character grew, she got more and more interesting.
Apparently, this movie is a sequel to "Henry Fool" which I need to see now, but the wait list online is "very long."
My next thought in watching was "this story is wonderfully complex, it wd be great in the hands of a more established director." In some senses that might still be true, but the same cd be said about a bigger budget.
However, both of those ideas cd ruin some of the great things as they were. Who knows?
I believe there's going to be a third so I look forward to that.
When I started watching this, I wasn't impressed and almost decided not to finish the movie. I'm glad I did. A certain bad actor had a smaller role the rest of the movie and Parker's style no longer suffered from it. Also, as her character grew, she got more and more interesting.
Apparently, this movie is a sequel to "Henry Fool" which I need to see now, but the wait list online is "very long."
My next thought in watching was "this story is wonderfully complex, it wd be great in the hands of a more established director." In some senses that might still be true, but the same cd be said about a bigger budget.
However, both of those ideas cd ruin some of the great things as they were. Who knows?
I believe there's going to be a third so I look forward to that.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Un condamné à mort s'est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut (A Man Escaped) (1956) - 4/5
Un condamné à mort s'est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut (A Man Escaped) (1956)
I have a feeling if I knew my stuff better, this movie wd get a 4.5 or 5 form me. Ideally, I'd read some more about it, but... time.
Great shots and imagery and the tone is consistently great. The use of the Priests/Bible is great.
There's so much behind the story that I know I missed, but what I caught, I liked and what I missed, I knew it was good even if I wasn't sure what it was. :)
The off-camera action was perfect.
SPOILERS:
...like how the first guy had to fail so that Fontaine cd succeed and how Fontaine wasn't content to escape alone - he had to find someone else to save when he was so confident it wd work.
I have a feeling if I knew my stuff better, this movie wd get a 4.5 or 5 form me. Ideally, I'd read some more about it, but... time.
Great shots and imagery and the tone is consistently great. The use of the Priests/Bible is great.
There's so much behind the story that I know I missed, but what I caught, I liked and what I missed, I knew it was good even if I wasn't sure what it was. :)
The off-camera action was perfect.
SPOILERS:
...like how the first guy had to fail so that Fontaine cd succeed and how Fontaine wasn't content to escape alone - he had to find someone else to save when he was so confident it wd work.
Monday, June 25, 2007
The Muppets Take Manhattan (1984) - 2.5/5
The Muppets Take Manhattan (1984)
This was a pretty big disappointment. I hadn't seen it before and I guess now I know why. Compared to "The Muppet Movie" it just doesn't compare... er...
It's like a bad rehash of the first movie: same basic plot of "going to the big city to get a big break in the big time."
One highlight is the rat song-dance scene in the kitchen. That's pretty good.
This was a pretty big disappointment. I hadn't seen it before and I guess now I know why. Compared to "The Muppet Movie" it just doesn't compare... er...
It's like a bad rehash of the first movie: same basic plot of "going to the big city to get a big break in the big time."
One highlight is the rat song-dance scene in the kitchen. That's pretty good.
Monday, June 18, 2007
The Muppet Movie (1979) - 3.5/5
The Muppet Movie (1979)
Very fun, funny and clever at times. It's corny and beautiful in that.
The cameos were great and the one-liners the best. I think this is a good case of parents probably being just as entertained.
Very fun, funny and clever at times. It's corny and beautiful in that.
The cameos were great and the one-liners the best. I think this is a good case of parents probably being just as entertained.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
The Departed (2006) - 4/5
The Departed (2006)
Incredible acting and characters. So many great performances.
I like the complicated "who's good? who's bad?", but they might have taken it a little too far. Still great.
SPOILERS:
As Costello said, "when you're facing a loaded gun, what's the difference?", so by the end the question of "good and bad" might not be worth trying to answer.
One quick shot still has me wondering about something. When Madolyn moves in w/ Colin, he goes to put a box away. There's a quick shot of what appears to be a TV screen of a hand going to pick up a phone receiver. Right after that, Costello calls Colin. I don't think it was ever explained???
Incredible acting and characters. So many great performances.
I like the complicated "who's good? who's bad?", but they might have taken it a little too far. Still great.
SPOILERS:
As Costello said, "when you're facing a loaded gun, what's the difference?", so by the end the question of "good and bad" might not be worth trying to answer.
One quick shot still has me wondering about something. When Madolyn moves in w/ Colin, he goes to put a box away. There's a quick shot of what appears to be a TV screen of a hand going to pick up a phone receiver. Right after that, Costello calls Colin. I don't think it was ever explained???
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Hope and Glory (1987) - 3.5/5
Hope and Glory (1987)
A very good, dramatic movie focusing on a WWII experience that we haven't really seen before. It's not a war movie, but more a drama set during the war - a great angle for a story.
The characters are great (except maybe the sister, but she grew on me too) and the imagery is strong.
A very good, dramatic movie focusing on a WWII experience that we haven't really seen before. It's not a war movie, but more a drama set during the war - a great angle for a story.
The characters are great (except maybe the sister, but she grew on me too) and the imagery is strong.
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Ocean's Thirteen (2007) - 3.5/5
Ocean's Thirteen (2007)
This was good in most ways with good levels of intensity, spyishness, humor and action. Basically no love story which I didn't see as a lack - there was so much else going on, I didn't miss it. The relationships btwn the main characters more than make up for it.
In some ways I think this is a modern "spy" movie w/ no political motives. There's a lot of the same elements, but a more light-hearted motive and payoff.
Also, this movie doesn't make me feel guilty for pulling for criminals to "win."
SPOILERS:
A few drawbacks: the motivation for the whole operation was a little thin. Fortunately, they didn't spend too much time on it. Pacino was good as a bad guy, I didn't need any more reason to want to see him lose.
I wasn't sure really why Bernie Mac's character had to go w/ the domino thing and the scam to get him in was weak.
The underground drill was WAY too much to buy. How cd they pull that off AND buy, get, install, etc. a new whatever-$36million-part-that-broke and so-on.
There's lots of stuff that can be overlooked, but the above was a bit much.
This was good in most ways with good levels of intensity, spyishness, humor and action. Basically no love story which I didn't see as a lack - there was so much else going on, I didn't miss it. The relationships btwn the main characters more than make up for it.
In some ways I think this is a modern "spy" movie w/ no political motives. There's a lot of the same elements, but a more light-hearted motive and payoff.
Also, this movie doesn't make me feel guilty for pulling for criminals to "win."
SPOILERS:
A few drawbacks: the motivation for the whole operation was a little thin. Fortunately, they didn't spend too much time on it. Pacino was good as a bad guy, I didn't need any more reason to want to see him lose.
I wasn't sure really why Bernie Mac's character had to go w/ the domino thing and the scam to get him in was weak.
The underground drill was WAY too much to buy. How cd they pull that off AND buy, get, install, etc. a new whatever-$36million-part-that-broke and so-on.
There's lots of stuff that can be overlooked, but the above was a bit much.
Shrek the Third (2007) - 3/5
Shrek the Third (2007)
It was pretty good w/ some funny parts, but the story was a bit thin and overall I just wasn't that drawn in or made to care.
They have a lot working against them in that the originality of the anti-fairy tale is gone and they're trying to walk a fine line to attract adult and child audiences.
SPOILERS:
The best part, imo, is when the Gingerbread man's life flashes before his eyes.
It was pretty good w/ some funny parts, but the story was a bit thin and overall I just wasn't that drawn in or made to care.
They have a lot working against them in that the originality of the anti-fairy tale is gone and they're trying to walk a fine line to attract adult and child audiences.
SPOILERS:
The best part, imo, is when the Gingerbread man's life flashes before his eyes.
Monday, June 04, 2007
Ringers: Lord of the Fans (2005) - 1/5
Ringers: Lord of the Fans (2005)
Very little new information and laughable "dramatizations" of the stereotypes from each decade and the fans. Those were so bad that they were probably the best part.
It was drawn out and w/ so much LOTR info out there, it just didn't have anything really new or interesting.
Very little new information and laughable "dramatizations" of the stereotypes from each decade and the fans. Those were so bad that they were probably the best part.
It was drawn out and w/ so much LOTR info out there, it just didn't have anything really new or interesting.
Everyone's Hero (2006) - 2.5/5
Everyone's Hero (2006)
We got this for our son and he isn't always that interested which makes us not all that interested.
It was a good, cute, simple story w/ decent moral content and imagination.
Nothing great, but nice and different than the normal Disxar stuff we're getting used to.
We got this for our son and he isn't always that interested which makes us not all that interested.
It was a good, cute, simple story w/ decent moral content and imagination.
Nothing great, but nice and different than the normal Disxar stuff we're getting used to.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Spellbound (2002/I) - 3/5
Spellbound (2002/I)
I liked "Wordplay" (see recent post) more. This documentary focuses more on the people in the movie whereas "Wordplay" focuses on the game and object of their passion. Ironically, I think you get more of the people from "Wordplay" than this.
That cd be b/c it's about kids and some of the passion and meaning fall out of it and it comes close to just being about "spelling words." Also, the stakes are higher which can take some of the fun out of it ("Wordplay" is just about people enjoying puzzles, no stress or pressure... to me).
The kids are great, but either the filmmakers didn't capture them well or there just isn't a ton there yet. Also, it cd be b/c they focused on 8 kids. That's a lot. After a while, I got a few of them mixed up in my head.
I liked "Wordplay" (see recent post) more. This documentary focuses more on the people in the movie whereas "Wordplay" focuses on the game and object of their passion. Ironically, I think you get more of the people from "Wordplay" than this.
That cd be b/c it's about kids and some of the passion and meaning fall out of it and it comes close to just being about "spelling words." Also, the stakes are higher which can take some of the fun out of it ("Wordplay" is just about people enjoying puzzles, no stress or pressure... to me).
The kids are great, but either the filmmakers didn't capture them well or there just isn't a ton there yet. Also, it cd be b/c they focused on 8 kids. That's a lot. After a while, I got a few of them mixed up in my head.
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007) - 3.5/5
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007)
A fun movie though pretty dark. I wdn't consider it a "kid's" movie. Also, it moves farther from the first in the trilogy (see previous post) which was more fatasy/adventure and more into a moral delimma at times which makes it harder to enjoy "pirates" as fun and charming like Jack.
There's a lot going on, many storylines and plots and it's long all which make it hard to hold together, but they do a good job.
A fun movie though pretty dark. I wdn't consider it a "kid's" movie. Also, it moves farther from the first in the trilogy (see previous post) which was more fatasy/adventure and more into a moral delimma at times which makes it harder to enjoy "pirates" as fun and charming like Jack.
There's a lot going on, many storylines and plots and it's long all which make it hard to hold together, but they do a good job.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) - 3.5/5
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003)
We've seen this one a few times, but apparently it's not in this blog. We actually watched both prequels this weekend and enjoy them both. I think seeing them close in time to each other, I prefer the first one b/c it has more of the magic of the Black Pearl and newness of pirates and mystery, etc.
I have to give credit still to the second one as it's only the first in a two-parter. I think it just took itself down a notch when I saw the sails on the Pearl patched up. The tattered sails in the first movie were just too good. :)
We've seen this one a few times, but apparently it's not in this blog. We actually watched both prequels this weekend and enjoy them both. I think seeing them close in time to each other, I prefer the first one b/c it has more of the magic of the Black Pearl and newness of pirates and mystery, etc.
I have to give credit still to the second one as it's only the first in a two-parter. I think it just took itself down a notch when I saw the sails on the Pearl patched up. The tattered sails in the first movie were just too good. :)
Wordplay (2006) - 3.5/5
Wordplay (2006)
Very fun and interesting and certainly made me want to play crossword puzzles. I'm always attracted to an area of interest that has a sense of 'community' which oddly ennough this seemed to have in the movie.
However, I think even in the movie they make it clear that this tends to be something you do alone. It's just great to see people sharing a common interest and passion for things in a social way. The talent show at the tournament says a lot too - there's more to these people and they accept each other very deeply.
As always, a documentary took a seeminly uninteresting premise and made it fun to watch.
Very fun and interesting and certainly made me want to play crossword puzzles. I'm always attracted to an area of interest that has a sense of 'community' which oddly ennough this seemed to have in the movie.
However, I think even in the movie they make it clear that this tends to be something you do alone. It's just great to see people sharing a common interest and passion for things in a social way. The talent show at the tournament says a lot too - there's more to these people and they accept each other very deeply.
As always, a documentary took a seeminly uninteresting premise and made it fun to watch.
Akeelah and the Bee (2006) - 3/5
Akeelah and the Bee (2006)
A bit sentimental, but good and enjoyable. A good simple story w/ deep characters and a good message that's doesn't hit you over the head w/ (too many) stereotypes and generalizations.
It's a good light version of many movies that maybe try too hard.
A bit sentimental, but good and enjoyable. A good simple story w/ deep characters and a good message that's doesn't hit you over the head w/ (too many) stereotypes and generalizations.
It's a good light version of many movies that maybe try too hard.
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Chariots of Fire (1981) - 4/5
Chariots of Fire (1981)
Somewhat making up for "Reds" as far as 1981's reputation goes... except for the soundtrack (Age of Synth).
I think there's several messages you can take from this: determination pays off, stick to your convictions no matter what and you'll succeed, that's true for you is true for you, sincerity is paramount, etc.
Eric Liddell honored God and wound up winning. Harold Abrahams honored himself and wound up winning. Neither wd compromise, both were passionate. Good movie, confusing message... if any.
Somewhat making up for "Reds" as far as 1981's reputation goes... except for the soundtrack (Age of Synth).
I think there's several messages you can take from this: determination pays off, stick to your convictions no matter what and you'll succeed, that's true for you is true for you, sincerity is paramount, etc.
Eric Liddell honored God and wound up winning. Harold Abrahams honored himself and wound up winning. Neither wd compromise, both were passionate. Good movie, confusing message... if any.
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Reds (1981) - 1.5/5
Reds (1981)
One of the few movies I didn't even finish watching. Partially b/c it wasn't very good and partially b/c I had so much more to watch - loooooooooooooong movie.
Too bad. 1981 must have been a bad year for movies for this to get so many awards and nominations.
One of the few movies I didn't even finish watching. Partially b/c it wasn't very good and partially b/c I had so much more to watch - loooooooooooooong movie.
Too bad. 1981 must have been a bad year for movies for this to get so many awards and nominations.
Friday, May 11, 2007
Spider-Man 3 (2007) - 3/5
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
Good movie. I'm not a big fan of the past 2 so this being my favorite (or at least the flavor of the day) isn't saying too much.
There's some good aspects to this movie, but I think they were too ambitious w/ the characters and storylines. You forget about subplots b/c they are ignored for so long and some bridges are forced and very questionable (SPOILER: Why did the butler wait so long to say what he said?).
Good movie. I'm not a big fan of the past 2 so this being my favorite (or at least the flavor of the day) isn't saying too much.
There's some good aspects to this movie, but I think they were too ambitious w/ the characters and storylines. You forget about subplots b/c they are ignored for so long and some bridges are forced and very questionable (SPOILER: Why did the butler wait so long to say what he said?).
Monday, May 07, 2007
The Illusionist (2006) - 2/5
The Illusionist (2006)
What a disappointment. Ed Norton is one of my favorites and he was SO flat. The story is rather weak and tends to focus on the aspects of it that aren't that interesting. They basically ignore the love story which we're suppose to buy into... but when?
The 'reveal' is also quite disappointing and predictable.
What a disappointment. Ed Norton is one of my favorites and he was SO flat. The story is rather weak and tends to focus on the aspects of it that aren't that interesting. They basically ignore the love story which we're suppose to buy into... but when?
The 'reveal' is also quite disappointing and predictable.
The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) - 4/5
The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)
Classic movie all around: war movie, romance, happy ending, etc. This is why we keep making movies about these things - we still remember how great they were back when it was original.
Classic movie all around: war movie, romance, happy ending, etc. This is why we keep making movies about these things - we still remember how great they were back when it was original.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Raging Bull (1980) - 4/5
Raging Bull (1980)
De Niro shines as a pretty horrible character. Rage is right! This guy is determined to get everything he wants and destroy it too.
Cathy Moriarty is also great - so smooth.
It's very intense in and out of the ring. I can't say enough about how great De Niro is, of course.
De Niro shines as a pretty horrible character. Rage is right! This guy is determined to get everything he wants and destroy it too.
Cathy Moriarty is also great - so smooth.
It's very intense in and out of the ring. I can't say enough about how great De Niro is, of course.
City Lights (1931) - 4.5/5
City Lights (1931)
Very fun, cute movie. I liked the simple story and natural feeling situations that let Chaplin shine. What a master!
This movie is a classic's classic. It's nice to watch these scenes knowing this is the material we're always seeing duplicated (but never as well).
Very fun, cute movie. I liked the simple story and natural feeling situations that let Chaplin shine. What a master!
This movie is a classic's classic. It's nice to watch these scenes knowing this is the material we're always seeing duplicated (but never as well).
Thursday, April 26, 2007
One Night with the King (2006) - 2.5/5
One Night with the King (2006)
Pretty good production, but somewhat disappointing/mixed acting. They changed the story which is a big no-no in my opinion. Not that they necessarily changed the message, but I really wanted to see the story I know and love.
Also, they added some sub-plots which may have added depth, but it didn't really work for me - again that cd be just b/c it was different.
The book of Esther is short so maybe it doesn't require a full length feature to tell it all. That cd be why they added other story lines, etc. which, to me, distract from the story.
They did some things well, but overall I was disappointed so read that into my rating.
Pretty good production, but somewhat disappointing/mixed acting. They changed the story which is a big no-no in my opinion. Not that they necessarily changed the message, but I really wanted to see the story I know and love.
Also, they added some sub-plots which may have added depth, but it didn't really work for me - again that cd be just b/c it was different.
The book of Esther is short so maybe it doesn't require a full length feature to tell it all. That cd be why they added other story lines, etc. which, to me, distract from the story.
They did some things well, but overall I was disappointed so read that into my rating.
Monday, April 23, 2007
Beyond the Gates of Splendor (2002) - 4.5/5
Beyond the Gates of Splendor (2002)
I wanted to watch this after "End of the Spear" and I think it's much better. I tend to like the actual people telling the stories. Plus, the real locations, people, photos and film, etc. So great.
This has much more backstory and explinations of their ideas, intentions, mindsets and heart for what they were doing.
I wanted to watch this after "End of the Spear" and I think it's much better. I tend to like the actual people telling the stories. Plus, the real locations, people, photos and film, etc. So great.
This has much more backstory and explinations of their ideas, intentions, mindsets and heart for what they were doing.
Friday, April 13, 2007
Blades of Glory (2007) - 4/5
Blades of Glory (2007)
Funny and good performances by Farrell and Heder. Great permise too.
For some reason, I was really distracted when I saw this movie so I can't seem to remember too much from it. I guess I can look forward to renting it.
Funny and good performances by Farrell and Heder. Great permise too.
For some reason, I was really distracted when I saw this movie so I can't seem to remember too much from it. I guess I can look forward to renting it.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
End of the Spear (2005) - 3.5/5
End of the Spear (2005)
An important story told fairly well. Not a great movie, but it tells and good and important true story.
It wasn't so much about Jim Elliot like I expected, but others and the tribe and such.
I wd recommend "Beyond the Gates of Splendor" over this movie.
An important story told fairly well. Not a great movie, but it tells and good and important true story.
It wasn't so much about Jim Elliot like I expected, but others and the tribe and such.
I wd recommend "Beyond the Gates of Splendor" over this movie.
Monday, April 09, 2007
Factotum (2005) - 1/5
Factotum (2005)
Decently acted, but the story and characters are fairly weak. Not much to like here and little reason to try. It started a bit weak and got worse.
Decently acted, but the story and characters are fairly weak. Not much to like here and little reason to try. It started a bit weak and got worse.
Monday, April 02, 2007
Facing the Giants (2006) - 5/5
Facing the Giants (2006)
This movie gets a very high rating for personal reasons. Like others, w/ such a low budget ($70k), it did a lot.
It's a bit cheesy, but for so many possible pitfalls and sensitive issues, there's a lot that cd go wrong. They navigated those well which is quite a feat.
I loved the message and they way it's told w/ focus on God, His word, prayer, trust, faith, etc.
This movie gets a very high rating for personal reasons. Like others, w/ such a low budget ($70k), it did a lot.
It's a bit cheesy, but for so many possible pitfalls and sensitive issues, there's a lot that cd go wrong. They navigated those well which is quite a feat.
I loved the message and they way it's told w/ focus on God, His word, prayer, trust, faith, etc.
Monday, March 26, 2007
"Extras" (2005) - 3.5/5
"Extras" (2005)
Not a "hilarious" show. Clever and original, but nothing incredible and kinda slow.
Also, it suffered from high expectations from me.
Not a "hilarious" show. Clever and original, but nothing incredible and kinda slow.
Also, it suffered from high expectations from me.
Monday, March 19, 2007
"Curb Your Enthusiasm" (2000) - 4/5
"Curb Your Enthusiasm" (2000)
Good show, but I had high expectations. I felt like it was "Seinfeld" on cable, but not as good - possibly b/c being like "Seinfeld" made it unoriginal.
Also, I felt like most episodes were formulaic - he wd do something in the begining which wd set him up to screw things up and come back on him later.
He's kinda Jerry and George rolled into one, but w/o the full cast, it's weakened.
Anyway, it's good and I'm told the next few seasons really get strong, but I was let down a little.
Good show, but I had high expectations. I felt like it was "Seinfeld" on cable, but not as good - possibly b/c being like "Seinfeld" made it unoriginal.
Also, I felt like most episodes were formulaic - he wd do something in the begining which wd set him up to screw things up and come back on him later.
He's kinda Jerry and George rolled into one, but w/o the full cast, it's weakened.
Anyway, it's good and I'm told the next few seasons really get strong, but I was let down a little.
Madagascar (2005) - 4/5
Madagascar (2005)
I really liked this movie. The overall story is decent and the characters are good, but the details and little jokes throughout the whole story cracked me up. I just really liked the detailed thought they put into the little actions and jokes and idiosyncrasies of everything: the personalities of the penguins, the mannerisms of the animals, the quick side jokes w/ the monkeys, etc.
So while this movie isn't like an 'instant classic', I had a lot of fun w/ it.
I really liked this movie. The overall story is decent and the characters are good, but the details and little jokes throughout the whole story cracked me up. I just really liked the detailed thought they put into the little actions and jokes and idiosyncrasies of everything: the personalities of the penguins, the mannerisms of the animals, the quick side jokes w/ the monkeys, etc.
So while this movie isn't like an 'instant classic', I had a lot of fun w/ it.
Igby Goes Down (2002) - 3.5/5
Igby Goes Down (2002)
I think I wd have liked this movie more if I were younger or more ideallistic or something. It reminded me a lot of "The Cather in the Rye." I read that when I was older and didn't like it that much - I just thought the kid was annoying, arrogant, selfish, judgemental and a baby... kinda like this movie.
However, in the second half of this movie, they dive deeper into his family and such and it gets better. The dynamic of his dad and brother and just where people start and wind up and how was interesting.
The acting, tone, etc. are all great and Kieran Culkin handles the lead very well. This movie has a lot going for it. I was probably meant to feel sorry for and sympathize w/ the lead more than thinking of him as a punk causing trouble around him, but...
I think I wd have liked this movie more if I were younger or more ideallistic or something. It reminded me a lot of "The Cather in the Rye." I read that when I was older and didn't like it that much - I just thought the kid was annoying, arrogant, selfish, judgemental and a baby... kinda like this movie.
However, in the second half of this movie, they dive deeper into his family and such and it gets better. The dynamic of his dad and brother and just where people start and wind up and how was interesting.
The acting, tone, etc. are all great and Kieran Culkin handles the lead very well. This movie has a lot going for it. I was probably meant to feel sorry for and sympathize w/ the lead more than thinking of him as a punk causing trouble around him, but...
Monday, March 12, 2007
Shopgirl (2005) - 3/5
Shopgirl (2005)
A good little story not trying to take on too much. What makes a relationship work? What makes a person happy? Why sd two people be together?
I love the pace of this movie. It cdn't be slower and more relaxing. Even the intense scenes are slow.
SPOILERS
I have to say that if I was suppose to buy into Mirabelle and Jeremy being together at the end, I don't think I can. I mean, at least, not buy into it and be satisfied w/ it. He just picked up a girl at her art show and slept w/ her soon before they're together. I'm not sure he's all that great of a guy. As for whether or not they are "right" for each other, that may be a separate question, but I think my feeling on it holds.
UPDATE: It seems Mirabelle is given the choice btwn 2 men. Neither, at first, can give her himself: one is self-absorbed and the other is emotionally closed off. However the second can give her other things like attention, gifts, etc. which are good but ultimately not enough.
Jeremy changes and eventually can give himself to her which, in movie reality, is love and is the 'right choice.'
I have to question if at any point either of them are right for her.
A good little story not trying to take on too much. What makes a relationship work? What makes a person happy? Why sd two people be together?
I love the pace of this movie. It cdn't be slower and more relaxing. Even the intense scenes are slow.
SPOILERS
I have to say that if I was suppose to buy into Mirabelle and Jeremy being together at the end, I don't think I can. I mean, at least, not buy into it and be satisfied w/ it. He just picked up a girl at her art show and slept w/ her soon before they're together. I'm not sure he's all that great of a guy. As for whether or not they are "right" for each other, that may be a separate question, but I think my feeling on it holds.
UPDATE: It seems Mirabelle is given the choice btwn 2 men. Neither, at first, can give her himself: one is self-absorbed and the other is emotionally closed off. However the second can give her other things like attention, gifts, etc. which are good but ultimately not enough.
Jeremy changes and eventually can give himself to her which, in movie reality, is love and is the 'right choice.'
I have to question if at any point either of them are right for her.
Stranger Than Fiction (2006) - 4/5
Stranger Than Fiction (2006)
I felt this was an original idea for a story and it was well told and acted.
SPOILERS
It's hard to pin down exactly what the point was, but I'd consider that to be a good thing. Was it that we sdn't let "numbers" control our lives?
Harold's life is all about numbers: he works at the IRS and is OCD about counting everything and living life in a very calculated manner.
Once that's "broken" he starts changing how he lives and actually starts living his life. Then people are brought into his life. Finally, he's forced to living based on "the facts" and chooses to die for someone else. This time his "living by the numbers" is for a purpose and by choice in the "right way."
But that leaves out Karen Eiffel and too many other characters out of the base of the story. However, to some degree it includes those people in Harold's life: the baker, the professor and the friend.
Karen Eiffel's part in the story is too big to be left out.
I'll have to think about this one some more.
I felt this was an original idea for a story and it was well told and acted.
SPOILERS
It's hard to pin down exactly what the point was, but I'd consider that to be a good thing. Was it that we sdn't let "numbers" control our lives?
Harold's life is all about numbers: he works at the IRS and is OCD about counting everything and living life in a very calculated manner.
Once that's "broken" he starts changing how he lives and actually starts living his life. Then people are brought into his life. Finally, he's forced to living based on "the facts" and chooses to die for someone else. This time his "living by the numbers" is for a purpose and by choice in the "right way."
But that leaves out Karen Eiffel and too many other characters out of the base of the story. However, to some degree it includes those people in Harold's life: the baker, the professor and the friend.
Karen Eiffel's part in the story is too big to be left out.
I'll have to think about this one some more.
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Lucky Number Slevin (2006) - 2/5
Lucky Number Slevin (2006)
Lots of big names, but Josh Hartnett pretty much cancels all that out.
I bet it was a good read, but the transition to the screen lost a lot. I'd say poor directing, but...???
Lots of big names, but Josh Hartnett pretty much cancels all that out.
I bet it was a good read, but the transition to the screen lost a lot. I'd say poor directing, but...???
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) - 3.5/5
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004)
Thought provoking, but a pretty dangerous movie. They certainly take a lot of leaps in their arguments to try to make their points. A good bit of slight-of-hand.
They also hit a lot of topics, concepts, scientific area/theories/ideas, use a cute story, animation, etc. It's hard to focus on one thing and when you try they're already on another point and you've only had time to understand their argument (and not examine it) before they've moved on.
Unfortunately, this probably had the opposite effect on me than what might be intended - I believed it less than they probably wanted. While their spiritual conclusions might be whacko, I'd like to know if their neurology had any merit b/c that cd be pretty interesting.
I wd love to see/read a response to this movie from someone I knew I cd trust. :)
The credentials of the interviewees (which you don't see until the end) are impressive, but these days it's hard to trust college professors and Ph.D.s and such w/o knowing more about them.
The reviews on IMDB are pretty negative, but well worded and intelligent.
I wd have given it a higher rating b/c it's interesting, but it's dangerous.
Thought provoking, but a pretty dangerous movie. They certainly take a lot of leaps in their arguments to try to make their points. A good bit of slight-of-hand.
They also hit a lot of topics, concepts, scientific area/theories/ideas, use a cute story, animation, etc. It's hard to focus on one thing and when you try they're already on another point and you've only had time to understand their argument (and not examine it) before they've moved on.
Unfortunately, this probably had the opposite effect on me than what might be intended - I believed it less than they probably wanted. While their spiritual conclusions might be whacko, I'd like to know if their neurology had any merit b/c that cd be pretty interesting.
I wd love to see/read a response to this movie from someone I knew I cd trust. :)
The credentials of the interviewees (which you don't see until the end) are impressive, but these days it's hard to trust college professors and Ph.D.s and such w/o knowing more about them.
The reviews on IMDB are pretty negative, but well worded and intelligent.
I wd have given it a higher rating b/c it's interesting, but it's dangerous.
Marche de l'empereur, La (2005) - 3.5/5
Marche de l'empereur, La (2005)
Good movie. They do a good job of taking a relatively simple story and making it interesting. They don't force any of the cuteness and don't hold back any/much of the tragedy.
Good movie. They do a good job of taking a relatively simple story and making it interesting. They don't force any of the cuteness and don't hold back any/much of the tragedy.
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Open Season (2006) - 2.5/5
Open Season (2006)
I can't really say too much about this. We watched it w/ our son and I was probably more interested in watching him than the movie. It definitely had some cute/funny parts, but over all I didn't think the story was that great... though I was distracted.
I was surprised to see (before it started) that it's rated PG. I think it deserved it b/c of the theme of hunting and all.
Anyway, it's decent, but there's better out there.
I can't really say too much about this. We watched it w/ our son and I was probably more interested in watching him than the movie. It definitely had some cute/funny parts, but over all I didn't think the story was that great... though I was distracted.
I was surprised to see (before it started) that it's rated PG. I think it deserved it b/c of the theme of hunting and all.
Anyway, it's decent, but there's better out there.
Just Like Heaven (2005) - 2/5
Just Like Heaven (2005)
Cute, but unoriginal, cliché, predictable, sappy, cheesy w/ sub-par acting, imo.
I get no joy in saying those things about it... kinda like watching the movie itself. :)
I thought this was "Far From Heaven" when I added it to my queue.
Cute, but unoriginal, cliché, predictable, sappy, cheesy w/ sub-par acting, imo.
I get no joy in saying those things about it... kinda like watching the movie itself. :)
I thought this was "Far From Heaven" when I added it to my queue.
Monday, February 12, 2007
Jésus de Montréal (1989) - 4.5/5
Jésus de Montréal (1989)
Great film. Only slightly dated too.
The premise is an actor is hired to put on a Passion play for a Catholic church. The priest has little faith himself and gives the actor free reign to hire who he wants and make any necessary changes to bring the play up to date.
The actors eventually feel the work is very significant and important.
Warning: one small scene of nudity - you'll know when.
SPOILERS:
The priest is admittedly a "bad" priest, but believes "a bad priest is still a priest" and won't give up his position despite his failings and discontentment. He believes a person "should live happily as long as possible." His only conviction seems to be that the Church serves the emotional needs of people who can't afford psychoanalysis or drugs elsewhere.
He is the modern Pharisee for the most part.
The "Jesus" character first gathers his followers starting w/ a single mother serving in a soup kitchen. She agrees to follow/support him and gives him a place to stay since "the son of man has no place to lie his head." We find out she's the priests mistress (adulterer) too.
Next he gathers other followers who are a group of misfits for various reasons resembling Jesus' followers.
The play is quite liberal and questions many of the claims of Jesus' life. The priest is worried about what his superiors will think and ultimately they try to shut down the play though the audiences/critics love it.
The actors all finally feel they are working on something meaningful and are more passionate about their "church" of acting. This includes a scene w/ one follower trying out for a "beer" commercial (which cdn't have been more blatant talking about how society "worships" beer and physical beauty, etc., but still great, that was the point).
Their insistance that she take her clothes off is such an insult in the Jesus character's "temple" that he has to over turn the tables and cleanse the house including whipping the "officials" w/ a whip of cords.
They go on w/ the play, but it is disrupted by security during the crucifixtion and thru an accident, the cross is knocked over and "Jesus" is hurt and taken to the hospital. His believers are somewhat scattered and there's little help amoung "His people" (St. Mark's hospital).
He begins to feel better and leaves though he starts his descent into the lower realms and darkness mentioning being forsaken by his father. He preaches to those standing idle underground being watched over by their master (and popular actor on a dard billboard for perfume).
He collapses and again those around him all scatter except for the two women. This time he's taken by Jews (the Jewish hospital) who care for his dead body. Ultimately, thru his death, others around the world are given life: a heart to an American, eyes to an Italian, etc.
This description may make the movie sound heavy handed and obvious, but I think they make it work well. The characters are good and their transformation is passionate. Early in the movie their attitude is literally "que sera sera" and by the end they are determined to continue w/ the work, establish an institution in their leader's memory and keep it free from defilment and compromise (though it is led by a clearly superficial lawyer - so great).
There are so many good scenes and shots in this movie that I think I'd have to watch it a few times to pick up on even more. Like a scene where they are all eating on the mountain and try to feed the guard who comes up. Just a part of a larger scene, but the details are great: the movement in the scenes (going up and down especially: stairs, escalators, buildings, etc.).
Great film. Only slightly dated too.
The premise is an actor is hired to put on a Passion play for a Catholic church. The priest has little faith himself and gives the actor free reign to hire who he wants and make any necessary changes to bring the play up to date.
The actors eventually feel the work is very significant and important.
Warning: one small scene of nudity - you'll know when.
SPOILERS:
The priest is admittedly a "bad" priest, but believes "a bad priest is still a priest" and won't give up his position despite his failings and discontentment. He believes a person "should live happily as long as possible." His only conviction seems to be that the Church serves the emotional needs of people who can't afford psychoanalysis or drugs elsewhere.
He is the modern Pharisee for the most part.
The "Jesus" character first gathers his followers starting w/ a single mother serving in a soup kitchen. She agrees to follow/support him and gives him a place to stay since "the son of man has no place to lie his head." We find out she's the priests mistress (adulterer) too.
Next he gathers other followers who are a group of misfits for various reasons resembling Jesus' followers.
The play is quite liberal and questions many of the claims of Jesus' life. The priest is worried about what his superiors will think and ultimately they try to shut down the play though the audiences/critics love it.
The actors all finally feel they are working on something meaningful and are more passionate about their "church" of acting. This includes a scene w/ one follower trying out for a "beer" commercial (which cdn't have been more blatant talking about how society "worships" beer and physical beauty, etc., but still great, that was the point).
Their insistance that she take her clothes off is such an insult in the Jesus character's "temple" that he has to over turn the tables and cleanse the house including whipping the "officials" w/ a whip of cords.
They go on w/ the play, but it is disrupted by security during the crucifixtion and thru an accident, the cross is knocked over and "Jesus" is hurt and taken to the hospital. His believers are somewhat scattered and there's little help amoung "His people" (St. Mark's hospital).
He begins to feel better and leaves though he starts his descent into the lower realms and darkness mentioning being forsaken by his father. He preaches to those standing idle underground being watched over by their master (and popular actor on a dard billboard for perfume).
He collapses and again those around him all scatter except for the two women. This time he's taken by Jews (the Jewish hospital) who care for his dead body. Ultimately, thru his death, others around the world are given life: a heart to an American, eyes to an Italian, etc.
This description may make the movie sound heavy handed and obvious, but I think they make it work well. The characters are good and their transformation is passionate. Early in the movie their attitude is literally "que sera sera" and by the end they are determined to continue w/ the work, establish an institution in their leader's memory and keep it free from defilment and compromise (though it is led by a clearly superficial lawyer - so great).
There are so many good scenes and shots in this movie that I think I'd have to watch it a few times to pick up on even more. Like a scene where they are all eating on the mountain and try to feed the guard who comes up. Just a part of a larger scene, but the details are great: the movement in the scenes (going up and down especially: stairs, escalators, buildings, etc.).
The Station Agent (2003) - 4/5
The Station Agent (2003)
Some semi-spoilers mixed in...
There's a lot of imagery in this movie especially revolving around trains which is an easy tie in. Fin is very much like a train: he dresses 'old fashion' and in black, he smokes, walks train tracks, doesn't speak hardly at all, very isolated, alone, no emotion or desire for interaction, etc.
He's content to live in solitude and even desires it. However, Joe, by his nature, insists on becoming his friend. His life is marked by service and human contact: he works a hot dog/ice cream/coffee stand and does that to serve his father (he's serving to serve). He forces his way into Fin's life and forces Olivia to come along to.
Olivia creates and nurtures but her life is a (train) wreck. She wants to help and it seems to provide for Fin in a way she can't for her son who died a couple years before. She sees Fin as someone to fill this role in her life as her son.
Joe's excitement and Olivia's motherliness eventually brings Fin out of his shell and converts him from a 'train watcher' to a 'people watcher.' He starts wearing clothes w/ some color, being interested in others and eventually smiles and cracks a joke.
He opens up only to find he gets hurt like he always feared. The resolution is not overwhelming or overly sappy, but well done and simple.
The acting is spot-on and the characters come thru instantly even if you don't know it at the time.
Some semi-spoilers mixed in...
There's a lot of imagery in this movie especially revolving around trains which is an easy tie in. Fin is very much like a train: he dresses 'old fashion' and in black, he smokes, walks train tracks, doesn't speak hardly at all, very isolated, alone, no emotion or desire for interaction, etc.
He's content to live in solitude and even desires it. However, Joe, by his nature, insists on becoming his friend. His life is marked by service and human contact: he works a hot dog/ice cream/coffee stand and does that to serve his father (he's serving to serve). He forces his way into Fin's life and forces Olivia to come along to.
Olivia creates and nurtures but her life is a (train) wreck. She wants to help and it seems to provide for Fin in a way she can't for her son who died a couple years before. She sees Fin as someone to fill this role in her life as her son.
Joe's excitement and Olivia's motherliness eventually brings Fin out of his shell and converts him from a 'train watcher' to a 'people watcher.' He starts wearing clothes w/ some color, being interested in others and eventually smiles and cracks a joke.
He opens up only to find he gets hurt like he always feared. The resolution is not overwhelming or overly sappy, but well done and simple.
The acting is spot-on and the characters come thru instantly even if you don't know it at the time.
Night at the Museum (2006) - 3/5
Night at the Museum (2006)
A good, light, fun movie that doesn't try to be too much. Owen Wilson stands out in a relatively small role. Robin Williams is pretty good too.
I think this movieis cute and wd probably be especially fun for kids, but I liked it too.
A good, light, fun movie that doesn't try to be too much. Owen Wilson stands out in a relatively small role. Robin Williams is pretty good too.
I think this movieis cute and wd probably be especially fun for kids, but I liked it too.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Unknown (2006) - 2/5
Unknown (2006)
I wanted to like this movie b/c it has so many things that appeal to me: I hadn't heard of it, good actors that I like, independent, low budget (at least that look'n'feel) and you are lost w/ the characters and learn as they do.
While I think the acting was good, I didn't think the characters were fleshed out. It seemed like they tried, but I didn't buy it. Maybe b/c I cdn't rely on anything b/c their memories and development were questionable (more in spoilers).
The people in the warehouse seemed to be 'going thru the motions' and not really getting anywhere and the character development wasn't effective.
The outside plot was unclear and also felt like fluff or 'killing time' until they cd get to the end and resolve things.
There's a lot going for this,but ultimately I think it lacked heart and soul required for this kinda thing. Maybe it was the result of a quick shooting schedule since it is an indie type thing.
SPOILERS
By the end, there were too many twists piled up on top of each other in rapid succession that it kinda lost the effect. He's a good guy, no a bad guy, no an undercover cop, no a bad undercover cop, w/ a plot w/ the other guy's wife, no ultimate a good guy, huh?
I wanted to like this movie b/c it has so many things that appeal to me: I hadn't heard of it, good actors that I like, independent, low budget (at least that look'n'feel) and you are lost w/ the characters and learn as they do.
While I think the acting was good, I didn't think the characters were fleshed out. It seemed like they tried, but I didn't buy it. Maybe b/c I cdn't rely on anything b/c their memories and development were questionable (more in spoilers).
The people in the warehouse seemed to be 'going thru the motions' and not really getting anywhere and the character development wasn't effective.
The outside plot was unclear and also felt like fluff or 'killing time' until they cd get to the end and resolve things.
There's a lot going for this,but ultimately I think it lacked heart and soul required for this kinda thing. Maybe it was the result of a quick shooting schedule since it is an indie type thing.
SPOILERS
By the end, there were too many twists piled up on top of each other in rapid succession that it kinda lost the effect. He's a good guy, no a bad guy, no an undercover cop, no a bad undercover cop, w/ a plot w/ the other guy's wife, no ultimate a good guy, huh?
Monday, February 05, 2007
Elizabethtown (2005) - 3/5
Elizabethtown (2005)
I heard this movie compared to "Garden State" and while I can see that, I think "Garden State" is considerably better. I think the tone is more consistent in "GS" and the acting is better also.
Orlando Bloom doesn't pull it off. I don't think he can 'do' emotion: the scenes requiring any type of bigger emotions from him fell pretty flat and akward.
It didn't seem like this movie cd decide if it wanted to be serious, funny, introspective, etc. In the end, that means it's none more often than not.
Kirsten Dunst was particularly good to me. I normally don't think too much of her, but she did a good job.
SPOILERS:
The best part of this movie was the last ~30 mins where he's driving across country w/ his dad's urn. The tone completely changes IMO and for the better. Invoking images of him w/ his dad and their love (which is missed for the rest of the movie not knowing what kind of relationship they had...which may be the point???) and the beauty of the time alone despite the death of one of them. :)
The 'fiasco' of the shoe isn't believable. No company wd put so much behind one person's creation who is just a guy w/a cubby hole of a desk. If they did, they wdn't have made it that far. Also, they wd have done test marketing, etc. It just distracted that it was so unbelievable.
Also, the mom's 'conversion' near the end from high-strung widow to practially stand-up comic was awkward.
I heard this movie compared to "Garden State" and while I can see that, I think "Garden State" is considerably better. I think the tone is more consistent in "GS" and the acting is better also.
Orlando Bloom doesn't pull it off. I don't think he can 'do' emotion: the scenes requiring any type of bigger emotions from him fell pretty flat and akward.
It didn't seem like this movie cd decide if it wanted to be serious, funny, introspective, etc. In the end, that means it's none more often than not.
Kirsten Dunst was particularly good to me. I normally don't think too much of her, but she did a good job.
SPOILERS:
The best part of this movie was the last ~30 mins where he's driving across country w/ his dad's urn. The tone completely changes IMO and for the better. Invoking images of him w/ his dad and their love (which is missed for the rest of the movie not knowing what kind of relationship they had...which may be the point???) and the beauty of the time alone despite the death of one of them. :)
The 'fiasco' of the shoe isn't believable. No company wd put so much behind one person's creation who is just a guy w/a cubby hole of a desk. If they did, they wdn't have made it that far. Also, they wd have done test marketing, etc. It just distracted that it was so unbelievable.
Also, the mom's 'conversion' near the end from high-strung widow to practially stand-up comic was awkward.
The Aviator (2004) - 4/5
The Aviator (2004)
Great acting. Blanchett, Alda and DiCaprio are at their best in my opinion. Unfortunately, it's hard for me to see DiCaprio as anything other than a babyface, but he came close and everything else was very impressive: his expressions, stance and mannerisms, voice (though maybe a little thin), etc. He was as good as he cd be and much better than most.
I loved the way Scorsese modeled the filming of the periods as they wd have looked during those years. Some scenes have the 'off' coloring as it wd have been filmed back then. Great device.
I wdn't say this movie is very 'informative' or gives a lot of answers yet it isn't close to a documentary either. It's a great blend of truth and artistic interpretation/storytelling as a biopic probably sd be.
I'm intrigued by Hughes so I enjoyed it on that level too.
And while I'd love to learn more about what happened after the movies timeline, I've seen enough on it to know that we don't really know it all clearly. So I'm glad they didn't even get into it.
Great acting. Blanchett, Alda and DiCaprio are at their best in my opinion. Unfortunately, it's hard for me to see DiCaprio as anything other than a babyface, but he came close and everything else was very impressive: his expressions, stance and mannerisms, voice (though maybe a little thin), etc. He was as good as he cd be and much better than most.
I loved the way Scorsese modeled the filming of the periods as they wd have looked during those years. Some scenes have the 'off' coloring as it wd have been filmed back then. Great device.
I wdn't say this movie is very 'informative' or gives a lot of answers yet it isn't close to a documentary either. It's a great blend of truth and artistic interpretation/storytelling as a biopic probably sd be.
I'm intrigued by Hughes so I enjoyed it on that level too.
And while I'd love to learn more about what happened after the movies timeline, I've seen enough on it to know that we don't really know it all clearly. So I'm glad they didn't even get into it.
The Devil Wears Prada (2006) - 3/5
The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
Meryl Streep was great. Undeniable.
The story was fair and somewhat cliche and/or predictable though not done poorly.
The characters were good, but Streep really made the movie as good as it was going to be.
Meryl Streep was great. Undeniable.
The story was fair and somewhat cliche and/or predictable though not done poorly.
The characters were good, but Streep really made the movie as good as it was going to be.
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Crash (2004/I) - 3/5
Crash (2004/I)
I think my expectations were too high for this. So many people said it was great.
I think I see what they're doing here, but maybe it's my cynacism getting in the way. It seems like they are saying "good people can do bad things (Ryan Phillipe and others) and bad people can do good things (Matt Dillon and others)... and everyone's racist."
I'm not sure if that's the message or if there's a bigger message. I'm not saying I disagree w/ the message as it is, but I'm not blown away by it.
It was well done and compelling. It's a good film as a film. But as far as what I got out of it: 3.
I think my expectations were too high for this. So many people said it was great.
I think I see what they're doing here, but maybe it's my cynacism getting in the way. It seems like they are saying "good people can do bad things (Ryan Phillipe and others) and bad people can do good things (Matt Dillon and others)... and everyone's racist."
I'm not sure if that's the message or if there's a bigger message. I'm not saying I disagree w/ the message as it is, but I'm not blown away by it.
It was well done and compelling. It's a good film as a film. But as far as what I got out of it: 3.
Monday, January 29, 2007
Rocky II (1979) - 3/5
Rocky II (1979)
I have to say this movie was better in my memory than on DVD. :)
The story was thin and transparent. The acting was hard to watch in many parts b/c it was cliche though it might only seem that way now. The motivation, for me, wasn't really there.
They tried to establish that Rocky 'is a fighter' and that's what he does. But he wasn't into it w/o Adrian's backing. Seems like a contradiction a little. I know what they were doing, but still.
The fight was good, but not great. Nothing significant happened it seemed: no swelling, ribs cracking, etc. Just worn out and Rocky's heart pulled him up at the end (oops, spoiler).
I just didn't buy into the heart of the story which is ashame b/c I remembered really liking this one in the past. Probably b/c he wins (oops, spoiler).
I still liked it, but not as much as I remembered. I guess I sdn't watch 3 and 4 and don't have interested in 5.
I have to say this movie was better in my memory than on DVD. :)
The story was thin and transparent. The acting was hard to watch in many parts b/c it was cliche though it might only seem that way now. The motivation, for me, wasn't really there.
They tried to establish that Rocky 'is a fighter' and that's what he does. But he wasn't into it w/o Adrian's backing. Seems like a contradiction a little. I know what they were doing, but still.
The fight was good, but not great. Nothing significant happened it seemed: no swelling, ribs cracking, etc. Just worn out and Rocky's heart pulled him up at the end (oops, spoiler).
I just didn't buy into the heart of the story which is ashame b/c I remembered really liking this one in the past. Probably b/c he wins (oops, spoiler).
I still liked it, but not as much as I remembered. I guess I sdn't watch 3 and 4 and don't have interested in 5.
Derailed (2005/I) - 3.5/5
Derailed (2005/I)
Good tension and characters. Just about everyone in this movie makes you feel uneasy/uncomfortable. Even the sick daughter just makes you feel uneasy.
It's nice that they didn't glamorize adultery. :)
SPOILERS:
Unfortunately, NGG (No Good Guys). Charles is the main character, but it's hard to sypathize w/him b/c he's trying to have an affair and lying to his family, etc.
Good tension and characters. Just about everyone in this movie makes you feel uneasy/uncomfortable. Even the sick daughter just makes you feel uneasy.
It's nice that they didn't glamorize adultery. :)
SPOILERS:
Unfortunately, NGG (No Good Guys). Charles is the main character, but it's hard to sypathize w/him b/c he's trying to have an affair and lying to his family, etc.
Monday, January 22, 2007
Serenity (2005) - 4/5
Serenity (2005)
I really liked the series (last post) and enjoyed the movie too. I think the movie was a great extension of the series: similar, but bigger, answers, but not too much 'ending.' I hope there's more movies, but I don't feel there necessarily has to be... but it wd be nice.
I'm watching the commentary by writer/director Joss Whedon now which tells me that I'm really enjoying the story behind the story. There's a lot here for a sci-fi fan and just someone who enjoys a good success based on a long-shot story.
SPOILERS
I really don't try hard to find faults in this movie, but when Mal first shoots the Operative, he sd have done more to get rid of him. They don't say this, but I have to wonder if he didn't want him dead for some reason. The second time he has a chance at him, he doesn't take it again. I was disappointed in that, but I think he wanted him to follow so that he wd see the video.
They don't explain that and I'm not sure if I'm right or not. If I'm right, they're probably giving the audience too much credit to figure that out. I'm surprised I did - I'm sure I wdn't have if I didn't try since I was bothered by Mal leaving him basically unharmed. So much of this story has been well done that I assumed this was too so that's my explination.
I really liked the series (last post) and enjoyed the movie too. I think the movie was a great extension of the series: similar, but bigger, answers, but not too much 'ending.' I hope there's more movies, but I don't feel there necessarily has to be... but it wd be nice.
I'm watching the commentary by writer/director Joss Whedon now which tells me that I'm really enjoying the story behind the story. There's a lot here for a sci-fi fan and just someone who enjoys a good success based on a long-shot story.
SPOILERS
I really don't try hard to find faults in this movie, but when Mal first shoots the Operative, he sd have done more to get rid of him. They don't say this, but I have to wonder if he didn't want him dead for some reason. The second time he has a chance at him, he doesn't take it again. I was disappointed in that, but I think he wanted him to follow so that he wd see the video.
They don't explain that and I'm not sure if I'm right or not. If I'm right, they're probably giving the audience too much credit to figure that out. I'm surprised I did - I'm sure I wdn't have if I didn't try since I was bothered by Mal leaving him basically unharmed. So much of this story has been well done that I assumed this was too so that's my explination.
Monday, January 08, 2007
"Firefly" (2002) (TV) - 4.5/5
"Firefly" (2002)
I really enjoyed this series and though I'm bummed it was cancelled a) it's nice to be able to see it all and have it contained and b) I probably wdn't have watched it otherwise.
I so like the idea of an underground series that had a loyal following and was made into a feature after being cancelled.
The characters and writing are very good and quite clever though not just for the sake of being clever. The bigger story is also good and I didn't get the feeling that they were just answering questions w/ more questions. Not that they had all the answers, but that the big questions weren't the main thing: the relationships, characters, individual episodes, etc. were just as important and the big picture.
So again, since my rating is based on how much I 'like' something, I gave it a high rating. Part of the reason I like it so much is b/c of the specifics: low budget, grassroots growth, underdog story, etc.
I also watched "Serenity" right after watching the series. Next post.
I really enjoyed this series and though I'm bummed it was cancelled a) it's nice to be able to see it all and have it contained and b) I probably wdn't have watched it otherwise.
I so like the idea of an underground series that had a loyal following and was made into a feature after being cancelled.
The characters and writing are very good and quite clever though not just for the sake of being clever. The bigger story is also good and I didn't get the feeling that they were just answering questions w/ more questions. Not that they had all the answers, but that the big questions weren't the main thing: the relationships, characters, individual episodes, etc. were just as important and the big picture.
So again, since my rating is based on how much I 'like' something, I gave it a high rating. Part of the reason I like it so much is b/c of the specifics: low budget, grassroots growth, underdog story, etc.
I also watched "Serenity" right after watching the series. Next post.
JFK (1991) - 3/5
JFK (1991)
This is a good film, but sdn't be taken as the truth or even close to it. This is the kinda thing Michael Moore sd be (and really is) doing: it's fiction based on and mixed with truth.
It makes for good drama and film, but dangerous if taken too literally.
Soon after watching this, we saw The Kennedy Assassination - Beyond Conspiracy which I felt dispelled a lot of the conspiracy aspects from JFK. Who knows what is true, but I think the two compliment each other in a sense. I just think JFK is somewhat dangerous. I've always thought this about Oliver Stone.
This is a good film, but sdn't be taken as the truth or even close to it. This is the kinda thing Michael Moore sd be (and really is) doing: it's fiction based on and mixed with truth.
It makes for good drama and film, but dangerous if taken too literally.
Soon after watching this, we saw The Kennedy Assassination - Beyond Conspiracy which I felt dispelled a lot of the conspiracy aspects from JFK. Who knows what is true, but I think the two compliment each other in a sense. I just think JFK is somewhat dangerous. I've always thought this about Oliver Stone.
Friday, January 05, 2007
Narc (2002) - 3.5/5
Narc (2002)
Very powerful performances and story. Quite intense. I really enjoyed the 'ride' thru this and trying to figure out who is who and what and everything else. Quite confusing, but very satisfying too.
Very powerful performances and story. Quite intense. I really enjoyed the 'ride' thru this and trying to figure out who is who and what and everything else. Quite confusing, but very satisfying too.
Thursday, January 04, 2007
My Super Ex-Girlfriend (2006) - 4/5
My Super Ex-Girlfriend (2006)
A 4 may seem high for this movie. Especially since it seems to get such poor reviews/ratings other places. Maybe my expectations were low, but I really liked it.
It was clever, original, cute, funny and very fun! It was like they had an idea (what if a super hero was more like a normal person... or better yet, not that great of a person in some ways, but is still a super hero) and they made that movie. Moreover, they didn't stray from it and make that person learn a big lesson, save the world, become a better citizen, etc. Nope.
It was a bit predictable, but who cares? And most elements of the movie were sorta sub-par, but those things just aren't that important to this type of movie. They did a great job of focusing on the characters and the premise and all.
Mostly I'm proud of them for sticking to the premise and playing that out.
A 4 may seem high for this movie. Especially since it seems to get such poor reviews/ratings other places. Maybe my expectations were low, but I really liked it.
It was clever, original, cute, funny and very fun! It was like they had an idea (what if a super hero was more like a normal person... or better yet, not that great of a person in some ways, but is still a super hero) and they made that movie. Moreover, they didn't stray from it and make that person learn a big lesson, save the world, become a better citizen, etc. Nope.
It was a bit predictable, but who cares? And most elements of the movie were sorta sub-par, but those things just aren't that important to this type of movie. They did a great job of focusing on the characters and the premise and all.
Mostly I'm proud of them for sticking to the premise and playing that out.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
The Sentinel (2006) - 2.5/5
The Sentinel (2006)
Again a forgotten post... I don't remember it well and probably wdn't recommend it so it gets a 2.5 b/c I remember liking it ok, but nothing more than that.
Again a forgotten post... I don't remember it well and probably wdn't recommend it so it gets a 2.5 b/c I remember liking it ok, but nothing more than that.
Thank You for Smoking (2005) - 2/5
Thank You for Smoking (2005)
Unfortunately I accidentally posted a draft for this post on a different blog and just now realized it. I saw it several weeks ago and don't remember too much about it which makes me think "It must not have been that great and I probably wdn't recommend it." So I gave it a 2.
I remember thinking it was pretty clever, but also I'm no fan of propaganda in movies.
Unfortunately I accidentally posted a draft for this post on a different blog and just now realized it. I saw it several weeks ago and don't remember too much about it which makes me think "It must not have been that great and I probably wdn't recommend it." So I gave it a 2.
I remember thinking it was pretty clever, but also I'm no fan of propaganda in movies.
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
Primer (2004) - 4.5/5
Primer (2004)
I really liked this movie.
(UPDATE: I went back and up'ed my rating of this movie so the next couple of sentences were made when I had it lower)
I wanted to give it a 4/5 or higher, but it's tough to rationalize w/ the many problems...
Given the circumstances around making the movie, it sd get a 5/5 or something.
The film focuses too much on the science of the situation and leaves too little to the meat of the story. I felt confused by the story, not the science. What happened? Why?
UPDATE:
The reason I up'ed the rating was b/c after thinking about it and I want my ratings to be how much I "like" the movie. Not just technically or artistically or whatever, but what I think about it and all that that entails: fun, clever, etc. How much it appeals to me. I've been thinking and talking about this movie ever since I saw it. I immediately started the director's commentary after watching the movie and immediately started the cast/crew commentary after that (though I didn't finish it).
SPOILERS
What happened to Thomas Granger? The just left that.
UPDATE:
Later in the director commentary he explains they don't know. Their present selves don't know how he found out about the box and what he did exactly, etc. So we don't either.
Why was Aaron leaving?
UPDATE:
Too many doubles and complications. The wiki page explains a lot, but it took me a while to agree w/the whole 'doubles' part.
Wikipedia.org has a great page on it here. I'm not sure I cd get all that from the movie???
I really liked this movie.
(UPDATE: I went back and up'ed my rating of this movie so the next couple of sentences were made when I had it lower)
I wanted to give it a 4/5 or higher, but it's tough to rationalize w/ the many problems...
Given the circumstances around making the movie, it sd get a 5/5 or something.
The film focuses too much on the science of the situation and leaves too little to the meat of the story. I felt confused by the story, not the science. What happened? Why?
UPDATE:
The reason I up'ed the rating was b/c after thinking about it and I want my ratings to be how much I "like" the movie. Not just technically or artistically or whatever, but what I think about it and all that that entails: fun, clever, etc. How much it appeals to me. I've been thinking and talking about this movie ever since I saw it. I immediately started the director's commentary after watching the movie and immediately started the cast/crew commentary after that (though I didn't finish it).
SPOILERS
What happened to Thomas Granger? The just left that.
UPDATE:
Later in the director commentary he explains they don't know. Their present selves don't know how he found out about the box and what he did exactly, etc. So we don't either.
Why was Aaron leaving?
UPDATE:
Too many doubles and complications. The wiki page explains a lot, but it took me a while to agree w/the whole 'doubles' part.
Wikipedia.org has a great page on it here. I'm not sure I cd get all that from the movie???
Friends with Money (2006) 1.5/5
Friends with Money (2006)
A non-story w/ great characters. A bad story told well. Depressing life situations for people who do it to themselves for the most part. Selfish, shallow people not being happy.
No ending at all which cd almost pass for being contemplative, but it's too much which just means they didn't have a good ending and just stopped to fake something powerful IMO.
Don't bother.
A non-story w/ great characters. A bad story told well. Depressing life situations for people who do it to themselves for the most part. Selfish, shallow people not being happy.
No ending at all which cd almost pass for being contemplative, but it's too much which just means they didn't have a good ending and just stopped to fake something powerful IMO.
Don't bother.
Friday, December 29, 2006
Heat (1995) - 3.5/5
Heat (1995)
Great acting and 'big' idea movie. The action is subtle and the relationships all around are tense.
I kept finding myself not knowing what I wanted to happen.
SPOILERS
Neil is ultimately able to walk away when he feels the heat, but it's not to save his own skin, but Eady's. It's a powerful statement on various levels.
However, it was unwise of him to make the side trip to risk it all. Not smart. And he sd have known that pulling the fire alarm wd attract a lot of attention. In some cases, that wd be fine (and the script called for it), but he sd have known the 'heat' wd come down.
Great acting and 'big' idea movie. The action is subtle and the relationships all around are tense.
I kept finding myself not knowing what I wanted to happen.
SPOILERS
Neil is ultimately able to walk away when he feels the heat, but it's not to save his own skin, but Eady's. It's a powerful statement on various levels.
However, it was unwise of him to make the side trip to risk it all. Not smart. And he sd have known that pulling the fire alarm wd attract a lot of attention. In some cases, that wd be fine (and the script called for it), but he sd have known the 'heat' wd come down.
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Little Miss Sunshine (2006) - 3/5
Little Miss Sunshine (2006)
I liked this movie, but I felt it was a bit thin.
SPOILERS
Each character has their own 'rejection':
the father: business
the grandfather: the retirement home, life and himself
the mother: her family
the son: society and eventually the Air Force Academy
the uncle: his boyfriend, society and himself
the daughter: potential rejection from others/society
They all feel that rejection and hate it and/or fight it. They all want to protect the daughter from the same, but realize (as in the Proust speech by the uncle) that it's the rejection that makes things great.
So they don't protect the daughter from rejection, but embrace their own rejection and join her in her's.
Good story, but an exaggerated and clumsy way to get there IMO. Still a decent movie.
I liked this movie, but I felt it was a bit thin.
SPOILERS
Each character has their own 'rejection':
the father: business
the grandfather: the retirement home, life and himself
the mother: her family
the son: society and eventually the Air Force Academy
the uncle: his boyfriend, society and himself
the daughter: potential rejection from others/society
They all feel that rejection and hate it and/or fight it. They all want to protect the daughter from the same, but realize (as in the Proust speech by the uncle) that it's the rejection that makes things great.
So they don't protect the daughter from rejection, but embrace their own rejection and join her in her's.
Good story, but an exaggerated and clumsy way to get there IMO. Still a decent movie.
Titanic (1997) - 4/5
Titanic (1997)
Good characters and good action/intensity.
The 'running through every hallway on every deck of the boat' during the second half got a little crazy, but the intensity was always there really.
It's probably b/c I'm getting older, but I'm having a harder and harder time w/ a couple of the cliche type ideas in movies like this:
- poor people are good, honest, fun and nice and rich people are evil.
- two people can meet, have feelings and fall in love and we sd want them to be together and it believe it's right w/in a couple hours to the extent that they are willing to give up everything and even die for one another.
This movie has flaws, but it's good.
Good characters and good action/intensity.
The 'running through every hallway on every deck of the boat' during the second half got a little crazy, but the intensity was always there really.
It's probably b/c I'm getting older, but I'm having a harder and harder time w/ a couple of the cliche type ideas in movies like this:
- poor people are good, honest, fun and nice and rich people are evil.
- two people can meet, have feelings and fall in love and we sd want them to be together and it believe it's right w/in a couple hours to the extent that they are willing to give up everything and even die for one another.
This movie has flaws, but it's good.
Rocky Balboa (2006) - 4/5
Rocky Balboa (2006)
Given the history, they did a great job. It was quite a trip down memory lane for a lot of the story and I liked that.
I didn't think the 'goal' was as defined as I had liked. In the end, I was convinced it was a 'happy ending', but I wasn't exactly sure why.
SPOILERS
Rocky seemed to have issues w/ 'going toe-to-toe' and 'having a beast in the basement' and such that he needed to deal w/. I just didn't feel that it was clear that the fight wd deal w/ these things.
Also, they didn't deal w/ the whole issue of Rocky's eye problem and such that casued so many problems w/ him boxing in the past. I didn't mind at all that it was ignored.
Given the history, they did a great job. It was quite a trip down memory lane for a lot of the story and I liked that.
I didn't think the 'goal' was as defined as I had liked. In the end, I was convinced it was a 'happy ending', but I wasn't exactly sure why.
SPOILERS
Rocky seemed to have issues w/ 'going toe-to-toe' and 'having a beast in the basement' and such that he needed to deal w/. I just didn't feel that it was clear that the fight wd deal w/ these things.
Also, they didn't deal w/ the whole issue of Rocky's eye problem and such that casued so many problems w/ him boxing in the past. I didn't mind at all that it was ignored.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Some Like It Hot (1959) - 3.5/5
Some Like It Hot (1959)
Another classic. Funny and original - still not copied much that I know of (not to the extent or as often as I wd expect given how good this movie is).
The story moves along well, but doesn't leave the characters behind.
Another classic. Funny and original - still not copied much that I know of (not to the extent or as often as I wd expect given how good this movie is).
The story moves along well, but doesn't leave the characters behind.
Friday, December 15, 2006
Desk Set (1957) - 3/5
Desk Set (1957)
Good classic type movie. Good performances and interesting situations that still hold true today in a fashion.
The characters and time are great. Fun to watch.
Hepburn steal the show.
Good classic type movie. Good performances and interesting situations that still hold true today in a fashion.
The characters and time are great. Fun to watch.
Hepburn steal the show.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
A note about my rating scale...
UPDATED (1.5.07): I wanted to change the slant of my ratings to be more like "how much I like this movie" as opposed to anything about a recommendation...
0-2 = Not worth seeing and probably not worth making notes for.
2.5 = I don't regret watching it, but I wdn't say it's worth your time.
3 = Pretty good, but there's still better stuff to watch.
3.5 = Decent movie. Might see it again.
4 = Good movie. I'd probably see it again. I like it.
4.5 = Really good, little things can't prevent a 5 so this cd be great.
5 = Dang!
Of course, the ratings are relative to what I'd expect/want from the movie. So while "Napoleon Dynamite" isn't the piece of film art that "Schindler's List" is, I can still give it just as good of a rating.
I don't have a checklist or equation to come up w/ the rating so one day I might give a movie a 3 where the next day I wd have given it a 4. I'm swayed by mood and who-knows-what. So my ratings might seem strange or inconsistent at times??? I guess I cd review them later and change my mind, but I don't intend to.
I wd change to 1-10, but it's too late now. That wd make searches easier since as of now if you search for "5/5" you'll also find "1.5/5" and the other "x.5/5" movies. Oh, well.
0-2 = Not worth seeing and probably not worth making notes for.
2.5 = I don't regret watching it, but I wdn't say it's worth your time.
3 = Pretty good, but there's still better stuff to watch.
3.5 = Decent movie. Might see it again.
4 = Good movie. I'd probably see it again. I like it.
4.5 = Really good, little things can't prevent a 5 so this cd be great.
5 = Dang!
Of course, the ratings are relative to what I'd expect/want from the movie. So while "Napoleon Dynamite" isn't the piece of film art that "Schindler's List" is, I can still give it just as good of a rating.
I don't have a checklist or equation to come up w/ the rating so one day I might give a movie a 3 where the next day I wd have given it a 4. I'm swayed by mood and who-knows-what. So my ratings might seem strange or inconsistent at times??? I guess I cd review them later and change my mind, but I don't intend to.
I wd change to 1-10, but it's too late now. That wd make searches easier since as of now if you search for "5/5" you'll also find "1.5/5" and the other "x.5/5" movies. Oh, well.
Deja Vu (2006) - 3.5/5
Deja Vu (2006)
A fun, intense thriller w/ some sci-fi thrown in there. You can't think too much during this, but there's no need to. It keeps things moving and intense most of the time. Just go along w/ the premise of everything and you'll be fine.
It's fairly dark too, but you secure w/ Doug Carlin taking command.
I think this movie was well done all around for the most part. I think the best part though is the maintained level of intensity for so long.
A fun, intense thriller w/ some sci-fi thrown in there. You can't think too much during this, but there's no need to. It keeps things moving and intense most of the time. Just go along w/ the premise of everything and you'll be fine.
It's fairly dark too, but you secure w/ Doug Carlin taking command.
I think this movie was well done all around for the most part. I think the best part though is the maintained level of intensity for so long.
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan (1982) - 3.5/5
Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
Such a perfect continuation of the show as far as the story goes. The whole theme of Kirk getting old wasn't too helpful to me, but I believe the movie certainly needed more than just an extended ST episode story.
I think I appreciated it more now than in past years. I liked the tie-in's from "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few... or the one." But also the ideas of ego from where Spock insists Kirk take command and that he has no ego to bruise. As opposed to Khan which had so much ego he it eventually cost him his life and the lives of those around him.
A lot of it is dated, but that's a given.
Also, Shatner's acting is... ya know.
It's clearly made in the early '80's so take that into consideration. :)
Such a perfect continuation of the show as far as the story goes. The whole theme of Kirk getting old wasn't too helpful to me, but I believe the movie certainly needed more than just an extended ST episode story.
I think I appreciated it more now than in past years. I liked the tie-in's from "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few... or the one." But also the ideas of ego from where Spock insists Kirk take command and that he has no ego to bruise. As opposed to Khan which had so much ego he it eventually cost him his life and the lives of those around him.
A lot of it is dated, but that's a given.
Also, Shatner's acting is... ya know.
It's clearly made in the early '80's so take that into consideration. :)
Saturday, December 09, 2006
Click (2006/I) - 4.5/5
Click (2006/I)
This is a very touching and moving movie to me. Maybe b/c it's an idea that's close to my heart of not wanting to waste a minute (though I don't consider staring at the wall or other such 'unproductive' activities necessarily a waste if done properly and chosen for purpose).
It's powerful for me to see someone miss out on such important things as your kids lives.
I think they do a great job of building the story and intensity and consequences of his choices throughout the movie.
SPOILERS:
I felt the end was really powerful. I'd hoped he wd have said to his son either at his wedding or later at the hospital "You're fired." to make a point.
Also, I felt the ending after the 'reveal' was too long - I felt it lost the emotional steam it built up from earlier. I think they sd have just had him go home, grab his family and tell them he quit his job or something. No need for details really. I guess they felt they needed to lighten the mood at the end, but I wish I had been left/dropped w/ the feeling before he woke up. And the remote from Morty at the end wasn't necessary either.
This is a very touching and moving movie to me. Maybe b/c it's an idea that's close to my heart of not wanting to waste a minute (though I don't consider staring at the wall or other such 'unproductive' activities necessarily a waste if done properly and chosen for purpose).
It's powerful for me to see someone miss out on such important things as your kids lives.
I think they do a great job of building the story and intensity and consequences of his choices throughout the movie.
SPOILERS:
I felt the end was really powerful. I'd hoped he wd have said to his son either at his wedding or later at the hospital "You're fired." to make a point.
Also, I felt the ending after the 'reveal' was too long - I felt it lost the emotional steam it built up from earlier. I think they sd have just had him go home, grab his family and tell them he quit his job or something. No need for details really. I guess they felt they needed to lighten the mood at the end, but I wish I had been left/dropped w/ the feeling before he woke up. And the remote from Morty at the end wasn't necessary either.
Friday, December 08, 2006
Joe Versus the Volcano (1990) - 3.5/5
Joe Versus the Volcano (1990)
Such a fun movie and it really shows Hanks and his 'fun' best to me. He's great in "Forrest Gump" of course, but this, to me, is when he really settled in to a great style.
Meg Ryan is great too in all her roles in this.
I love this...
Such a fun movie and it really shows Hanks and his 'fun' best to me. He's great in "Forrest Gump" of course, but this, to me, is when he really settled in to a great style.
Meg Ryan is great too in all her roles in this.
I love this...
Luggage Salesman: This is our premier steamer trunk, it's all handmade, only the finest materials. It's even watertight, tight as a drum. If I had the need, and the wherewithal, Mr. Banks, this would be my trunk of choice.
Joe Banks: I'll take four of them.
Luggage Salesman: May you live to be a thousand years old, sir.
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Reservoir Dogs (1992) - 4/5
Reservoir Dogs (1992)
A great movie that started a great trend and career of Quentin Tarantino.
I'm still left w/ the question of: Who shot Nice Guy Eddie Cabot?
If you haven't seen it and that's a spoiler, you probably aren't going to see it.
A great movie that started a great trend and career of Quentin Tarantino.
I'm still left w/ the question of: Who shot Nice Guy Eddie Cabot?
If you haven't seen it and that's a spoiler, you probably aren't going to see it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
